“We expect more from technology and less from each other.”
Sherry Turkle wrote or delivered these words in 2012 in “Connected, but alone?.” Turkle's TED talk drew on decades of research into how people form relationships with computers and one another. She warned that constant connection can substitute manageable exchanges for demanding conversation. Read in its original setting, the sentence is more precise than a motivational slogan. The date assigned to this NewsStreets series is a calendar placement, not a claim that the quotation originated on March 12. Restoring the source keeps the words connected to the problem, audience, and technical conditions that made them meaningful. It also shows which part of the argument belongs to Sherry Turkle and which interpretations were added later as the technology spread into new settings.
The claim matters because it changes where responsibility is placed. Digital tools reshape expectations as well as behavior, sometimes making frictionless interaction feel preferable to vulnerable human attention. Teams can apply that insight by naming the outcome they want, identifying the people affected, and choosing evidence that would reveal whether the design actually helps. A memorable quotation is useful when it sharpens a decision: architecture, interface, governance, maintenance, or the allocation of power. It is less useful when it is used to borrow authority without examining the speaker's reasoning. In practice, the principle should change a review question, a test plan, or an ownership decision rather than merely decorate a presentation.
The line becomes misleading when it is treated as a universal rule. Technology does not produce one universal social outcome. Design, culture, age, disability, and circumstance can make mediated communication isolating in one setting and liberating in another. Technology operates inside organizations and communities, so performance on a narrow benchmark cannot settle every question. Responsible practice makes assumptions explicit, documents tradeoffs, invites criticism, and provides a way to correct harm. That discipline does not weaken innovation; it gives ambitious work a clearer relationship to evidence and a more honest account of who carries the risk. A careful reader should therefore ask what the quotation leaves outside its frame, which stakeholders are absent, and what contrary evidence would require a different conclusion.
The modern relevance is easy to find but should still be stated specifically. Generative companions, remote work, algorithmic feeds, and smartphone habits make the quality—not simply the quantity—of connection a pressing design question. For individuals, the quote can guide the next choice without pretending to supply a complete formula. For organizations, it can prompt clearer goals, better measurements, and more accountable ownership. Its lasting value lies in translating an influential idea into careful practice: understand the source, test the claim, keep the limitations visible, and revise the system when real users or real conditions contradict the preferred story. The standard is not admiration for a famous technologist; it is whether the idea helps people build systems that are more understandable, dependable, useful, and worthy of trust.
Sherry Turkle used the line in “Connected, but alone?” in 2012. Turkle's TED talk drew on decades of research into how people form relationships with computers and one another. She warned that constant connection can substitute manageable exchanges for demanding conversation.
The setting separates the documented argument from later retellings and prevents the calendar date in this series from being mistaken for the date of origin.
Digital tools reshape expectations as well as behavior, sometimes making frictionless interaction feel preferable to vulnerable human attention.
Technology does not produce one universal social outcome. Design, culture, age, disability, and circumstance can make mediated communication isolating in one setting and liberating in another.
Generative companions, remote work, algorithmic feeds, and smartphone habits make the quality—not simply the quantity—of connection a pressing design question.
The strongest present-day use is practical: connect the principle to evidence, state the tradeoffs, and keep responsibility visible when technology changes people's choices or opportunities.
Explore more "Quotes of The Day"
Discover more notable quotes from influential voices across politics, science, business, technology, sports, and culture. Each quote offers insight into how ideas, beliefs, and decisions shape the world around us.