“Strategy is choice.”
Roger L. Martin uses this formulation to counter the habit of calling plans, aspirations, or exhaustive activity lists a strategy. In Playing to Win, written with A.G. Lafley, strategy is an integrated set of choices about winning aspiration, where to play, how to win, required capabilities, and management systems. Choice matters because resources are finite and because advantage depends on concentrating them in a distinctive way. A statement that includes every customer, market, channel, and priority avoids the discomfort of exclusion but provides little guidance when decisions compete.
Good choices reinforce one another. A company selects a specific customer and arena, defines the value or advantage it will create there, develops the capabilities necessary to deliver it, and builds systems that sustain those capabilities. The strategy then guides everyday tradeoffs in product design, hiring, investment, and partnerships. Leaders can test the logic by asking what would have to be true about customers, competitors, costs, and organizational ability for the choices to succeed. Assumptions become research questions rather than hidden articles of faith.
Choice should not be confused with a rigid prediction or a dramatic bet made without evidence. A firm can preserve options, run tests, and revise as learning changes the underlying logic. Exclusion also carries consequences for employees and communities, so leaders owe transparent reasoning and responsible transitions. Martin’s point is that ambiguity has costs too: teams cannot coordinate when every opportunity remains equally important. Strategy combines commitment with a method for updating commitment, not certainty with refusal to reconsider.
The line is a fitting end to a month of business quotations because it converts ideas into boundaries. AI may expand what a company could do, but capability abundance makes selection more important. Leaders can name the problem, choose the customer and outcome, specify the few capabilities that deserve disproportionate investment, and identify attractive activities they will decline. Reviews should test the assumptions rather than adding priorities whenever anxiety rises. Martin’s two words provide a strict final question for any strategic document: what has this organization actually chosen? A choice cascade should be revisited from the bottom upward as well as the top downward. If the required capabilities cannot be built responsibly or the management systems reward contradictory behavior, the playing-field and winning choices may need revision. This reciprocal check keeps strategy from becoming a hierarchy of wishes. It joins ambition to operating truth and makes the organization’s exclusions as deliberate as its investments.
Martin made choice central to Playing to Win, the 2013 strategy book he wrote with A.G. Lafley.
Their choice cascade links aspiration, playing field, winning approach, capabilities, and management systems.
Strategy concentrates resources through mutually reinforcing choices and states the assumptions that must hold.
Commitment can coexist with experiments, options, ethical constraints, and revision when evidence changes the logic.
AI expands the set of possible projects, increasing the coordination cost of treating every opportunity as a priority.
Explicit choices about customers, outcomes, capabilities, and exclusions turn possibility into an executable direction.
Explore more "Quotes of The Day"
Discover more notable quotes from influential voices across politics, science, business, technology, sports, and culture. Each quote offers insight into how ideas, beliefs, and decisions shape the world around us.