“Our aspiration is to grow only to the extent we need to, in order to really change the health system.”
Rebecca Onie made this statement in a 2010 Harvard Law School profile about Project HEALTH, the organization that later became Health Leads. The same words appear in the printed Harvard Law Bulletin. The profile describes a service connecting patients with help for needs such as food and housing, and an ambition to influence the wider organization of care. Against that background, the quote makes growth conditional. A larger operation can reach more people, yet size is useful only when it serves the change the organization exists to pursue. Onie’s sentence asks leaders to keep those two questions connected: how much should an organization expand, and what should become different for the people it serves? It gives the mission a role in deciding the scale, rather than allowing scale alone to become the measure by which the mission is judged.
That distinction can matter whenever a promising service attracts attention. More sites, staff or partnerships are easy to count. A change in how a person experiences care may be harder to describe, but it is closer to the reason the service was created. Imagine a project that helps patients find a community resource. Expansion can increase the number of introductions while leaving unresolved whether the resource has room, whether the person can reach it or whether assistance actually follows. This example is a reflection on the quote rather than a report of Onie’s program. It suggests that a meaningful account of growth should follow the experience far enough to understand its practical outcome. When a problem is identified, an organization may need to improve a connection or influence a rule, even if that work does not produce an impressive new headline about its own size.
The sentence also creates space for cooperation. An organization committed to a healthier system can recognize that a lasting improvement may involve another group taking a larger role. Sharing knowledge, improving a routine or helping a service become more responsive may advance the mission without putting the original organization at the center of every activity. That is a demanding form of leadership because visible expansion can bring recognition while quieter changes may be harder to claim. For a reader evaluating a health initiative, Onie’s words offer a practical question: what does the proposed growth make possible for the people whose needs started the work? A convincing answer can describe the intended change, the obstacles that remain and how the organization will learn whether its approach helps. The quote encourages ambition with a clear direction. Growth earns its place when it contributes to a better functioning system and preserves attention to the human purpose behind the work.
The number of people contacted can show the scale of a service. It cannot by itself show whether the contact led to useful assistance.
Follow the experience far enough to understand what happened next. A meaningful measure should remain connected to the reason the service exists.
Onie makes expansion conditional on its contribution to system change. That creates a reason to ask which kind of growth serves the goal.
An organization may need to improve an existing connection before opening another site. Scale should reflect what the work requires rather than become its automatic destination.
A lasting improvement may depend on another institution changing its routine. Helping that happen can advance a mission without enlarging the original organization.
Shared work needs clear responsibilities and recognition of each contribution. The useful result matters more than keeping one group at the center.
Explore more "Quotes of The Day"
Discover more notable quotes from influential voices across politics, science, business, technology, sports, and culture. Each quote offers insight into how ideas, beliefs, and decisions shape the world around us.